Best for Healthcare

Best HIPAA-Compliant AI Meeting Assistants for Healthcare

For patient visits, telehealth, and any conversation that touches protected health information, the signed Business Associate Agreement is the line that matters. Here is who clears it, and who to keep away from PHI entirely.

Reviewed by Marcus Webb | Last updated October 2026

The best HIPAA-compliant AI meeting assistant for healthcare organizations in 2026 is Hedy. On its Enterprise plan it signs a BAA and can enforce on-device processing on every clinician's device, so protected health information never has to reach a vendor server, with any cloud data kept in a Google Cloud project the organization owns. Hedy Enterprise starts at 200 seats. Fellow is the strongest cloud option for clinical teams, and Zoom AI Companion suits practices already on a Zoom plan with a BAA.

"HIPAA-compliant" is not a badge a tool earns once and displays forever. It is a set of obligations the vendor takes on, and the one that actually protects you is a signed Business Associate Agreement. Without a BAA, no encryption claim or compliance logo makes a tool safe for protected health information. Beyond the BAA, look for encryption in transit and at rest, configurable retention, audit controls, and a written commitment never to train on your data. On-device processing is the safest default for PHI: data that never leaves the clinician's machine cannot be exposed by a vendor breach. The picks below are ordered by how well they meet that bar, followed by three tools you should keep away from PHI.

HIPAA Readiness: How the Tools Compare

ToolHIPAA / BAATrains on your data?On-device option?
Hedy BAA on Enterprise (200-seat minimum); HIPAA Business Associate assessment + SOC 2 Type I (Apr 2026) No (contractual) Yes — full on-device pipeline, enforceable on Enterprise
Fellow HIPAA support with signed BAAs; SOC 2 Type II No (contractual) No — cloud only
Zoom AI Companion HIPAA-eligible under a Zoom BAA; confirm it covers AI features No No — cloud only
Fireflies.ai HIPAA on Business/Enterprise; confirm signed BAA directly Confirm per tier No — cloud only
Plaud.ai HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II company-wide (Trust Center); BAA plan unpublished No Hardware recorder; cloud processing
Read.ai HIPAA on Enterprise+ tier only (larger orgs) Confirm per tier No — cloud only
Otter.ai No BAA on free/standard; confirm any enterprise BAA Yes, by default on free/standard No — cloud only
Granola No BAA on free/standard Yes by default (anonymized); opt out in Settings No — cloud transcription
Notta Does not sign BAAs Unclear — "no AI training" is listed as an Enterprise feature Optional on-device transcription (beta); AI in cloud

Why a Signed BAA Is the Dealbreaker

Under HIPAA, any vendor that handles protected health information on your behalf is a business associate, and you need a signed Business Associate Agreement with them before a single session note touches their system. No BAA, no lawful path to put PHI through the tool. The marketing copy is beside the point. So the first question is never "is it encrypted." It is "will they sign a BAA covering the exact features I plan to use." Several tools that advertise HIPAA support gate the BAA to higher tiers. Notta does not sign one at all, and it lists "no AI training" only as an Enterprise feature, which implies lower tiers may be used. Otter and Granola sign no BAA on their free and standard plans and train on your data there by default, which puts them out of bounds for PHI until you have an enterprise contract verified in writing.

The architecture underneath the BAA still matters. A cloud tool with a strong BAA, solid encryption, and a no-training pledge can be compliant. But the audio and transcript leave the clinician's machine and sit on a vendor's servers, which is exactly what a breach exposes. On-device processing removes that exposure at the source. Hedy can run transcription, summaries, and analysis locally on supported hardware through its Local AI Processing release, and on its Enterprise plan the organization can enforce that on every device, so the most sensitive part of a patient conversation stays on the clinician's machine and never reaches a server. That is why Hedy leads this list. It pairs the on-device default with the contractual and compliance scaffolding: a BAA on Enterprise (200-seat minimum), EU or US data residency, AES-256 and TLS 1.3 encryption, and a completed SOC 2 Type I and HIPAA Business Associate assessment from April 2026.

Compliance does not discharge consent. A signed BAA covers your relationship with the vendor. It says nothing about your client's agreement to be recorded. Recording laws vary by state, and some, including California, require all-party consent. Telehealth across state lines adds another layer, because you may be bound by the rules of the state where the client is located. Whatever tool you choose, get and document client consent before recording, and treat that as a separate, non-negotiable step. For the full breakdown of how to vet a vendor's HIPAA posture, see our companion guide on choosing a HIPAA-compliant AI note-taker for healthcare.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes an AI meeting assistant actually HIPAA-compliant? +
HIPAA compliance is not a certification a tool can buy. It requires the vendor to sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA), encrypt data in transit and at rest, offer configurable retention, provide audit controls, and never train on your data. The signed BAA is the dealbreaker: without one, no tool can lawfully process protected health information, whatever its marketing says. For PHI, on-device processing like Hedy's is the safest default, because the data never reaches a vendor server in the first place.
Which AI meeting assistant is best for a healthcare organization? +
Hedy is our top pick for healthcare organizations that can sign an enterprise contract. Its Enterprise plan (annual, 200-seat minimum) includes a signed BAA, can enforce on-device processing on every device so patient audio and notes stay on clinicians' machines, and can keep any cloud data in a Google Cloud project the organization owns. It is backed by a SOC 2 Type I and HIPAA Business Associate assessment completed in April 2026. Smaller clinical teams should compare BAA minimums: Fellow signs BAAs on its Enterprise plan from 10 users, with SOC 2 Type II, and Zoom offers BAAs to practices already on a qualifying Zoom plan.
Can I use Otter.ai, Granola, or Notta for healthcare conversations? +
Keep all three away from protected health information unless you have verified otherwise in writing. Otter and Granola sign no BAA on their free and standard plans and train on your data there by default. Granola documents a BAA on its Enterprise plan only; any Otter enterprise BAA must be confirmed directly. Notta does not sign BAAs at all and lists "no AI training" only as an Enterprise feature. For PHI, choose a tool that will sign a BAA covering the exact features you use, or process on-device so the data never leaves your machine.
Does a HIPAA-compliant tool mean I do not need client consent to record? +
No. A signed BAA governs your relationship with the vendor. It does not cover your client's consent to being recorded. Recording laws vary by state, and some, such as California, require all-party consent. Telehealth across state lines can subject you to the rules of the state where the client is located. Get and document client consent before every recording, and treat it as a separate obligation from vendor compliance.