← All Rankings | #23 Overall | Reviewed by Sarah Chen | Last updated 2026-06-04
Cloud-Based

Notta

AI meeting assistant with multilingual transcription

Category
Cloud-Based
Platforms
web, ios, android, chrome, mac, windows
Starting Price
$8.17/mo
Free Tier
Yes

Notta ranks #23 of 24 AI meeting assistants we tested in 2026, scoring 3.2 out of 5. A capable multilingual cloud transcriber that has grown its platform and integration story, but real-time translation now costs extra and everything still runs in the cloud. Pricing starts at $8.17/mo with a free tier available. Available on web, ios, android, chrome, mac, windows.

notta.ai
Notta cloud-based AI meeting assistant — AI meeting assistant with multilingual transcription

Rating Breakdown

Privacy & Data Security High 3/5
Transcription Accuracy High 4/5
AI Analysis Quality High 4/5
Recording Consent & Compliance Med 3/5
Data Retention & Training Transparency Med 2/5
Real-Time / Live Capability Med 3/5
Recording Method Med 3/5
Ease of Use Med 4/5
Platform Support Med 4/5
Offline Capability Med 1/5
Integration Ecosystem Med 4/5
Knowledge Connection Low 3/5
Pricing & Value Low 3/5

Strengths

  • + Broad language coverage (100+ for transcription)
  • + Native iOS, Android, and now Mac/Windows desktop apps
  • + Bot-free local capture via Notta Desktop
  • + Expanded integration set (Salesforce, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, more)

Weaknesses

  • Cloud processing only
  • Real-time translation is now a paid add-on, not bundled
  • Restrictive free tier (3-minute cap per recording)
  • Reports of auto-renewal charges after cancellation attempts

Our Verdict

A capable multilingual cloud transcriber that has grown its platform and integration story, but real-time translation now costs extra and everything still runs in the cloud.

Notta built its meeting assistant around one clear strength: language coverage. Where many competitors lead with English and bolt on other languages later, Notta has leaned into multilingual transcription from the start. The platform markets 100-plus languages and dialects for transcription (58 is its core monolingual count), which makes it a practical pick for international teams and cross-border work. Real-time translation is part of the pitch too, though as of 2026 it has moved into paid add-on territory rather than coming bundled with the base plan.

The Tokyo-based company has been busy. A ~$6.3M raise in mid-2025 funded a US push, and a ~$15M Series B in December 2025 (led by Granite-Integral Capital) is going toward enterprise expansion and AI-agent development, including deeper Zoom, Google Meet, Salesforce, and Slack integrations. Notta reports figures in the millions of users and hundreds of millions of audio hours processed, though we treat those vendor numbers as context rather than verified fact.

Notta can join Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls with a bot, and it also runs on mobile for in-person recording. As of an April 2026 beta, there is now a native Notta Desktop app for both Mac and Windows that captures meeting audio directly off your device without sending a bot into the call. That is a meaningful shift from the bot-only framing the product carried for years. Audio still gets processed in the cloud either way, and Notta returns transcripts with speaker labels, AI summaries, and action items. Accuracy is strong across major languages and thins out on less common ones.

The mobile apps remain a real asset. Both the iOS and Android versions work as standalone recorders, so Notta is useful well beyond scheduled video calls: in-person meetings, lectures, interviews, voice memos. The experience is clean, and the combination of phone, browser extension, and now desktop makes Notta one of the more flexible options for capturing audio wherever it happens.

Key Features

Multilingual transcription is the headline, with 100-plus languages and dialects supported. Recording happens three ways now: a bot that joins major video platforms, the mobile apps for in-person audio, and the new Notta Desktop app that captures locally without a bot. AI summaries and action items are generated after each meeting, and Notta has added an ask-anything AI chat that lets you query a recorded transcript conversationally (“What were the action items?”, “Summarize the client feedback”) rather than only reading a static summary. A web editor syncs the audio to the transcript for review and correction.

Integrations have expanded considerably from where this product sat a year ago. Salesforce, Slack, Notion, Zoom, and Google Meet are built in, with HubSpot and other CRM connections, Google Docs, ClickUp, OneNote, and Zapier filling out the rest. The Series B funding is explicitly aimed at pushing this further with AI-agent capabilities.

One genuinely new direction worth noting: Notta Memo, a $149 standalone AI voice recorder. It is a thin, sub-ounce hardware device that auto-syncs to the cloud platform for transcription and summarization, putting Notta in direct competition with Plaud.ai and serving as a low-friction on-ramp into the subscription.

Pricing

There is a free plan, but read the fine print before relying on it. It allows 120 transcription minutes per month, caps each individual recording at 3 minutes, limits you to roughly 10 AI summaries per month, and locks transcript downloads behind a paid plan. For anything beyond light testing, that 3-minute ceiling makes it impractical.

The Pro plan is $13.99 per month billed monthly, or about $8.17 per month ($97.99/year) billed annually, and lifts you to 1,800 minutes per month with recordings up to 5 hours. Business runs $27.99 per seat monthly or about $16.67 per seat annually ($199.99/seat/year) with unlimited minutes and team admin controls. Enterprise is custom-quoted and now gated to 51+ seats.

Two pricing caveats matter. First, real-time translation is no longer bundled into Pro the way it once was; it is a paid add-on (roughly +$6/mo for monolingual real-time translation on annual billing, or +$9/mo for bilingual transcription-plus-translation), so the “multilingual is included” assumption no longer holds for the headline feature. Second, multiple users have reported being charged on auto-renewal after attempting to cancel, which is worth knowing before committing to an annual term.

Privacy & Security

Notta processes all audio through its cloud. It holds ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2, with data encrypted in transit and at rest, which covers the baseline. The fundamental tradeoff stands, though: every recording is uploaded to and processed on Notta’s servers, and the new bot-free desktop capture changes how audio is collected, not where it ends up.

There is one specific wrinkle. Notta has been reported to use Japanese-language conversations to train its AI, with the opt-out available only on Enterprise. For teams handling sensitive or regulated cross-border content, that combination of cloud processing, training use, and tiered opt-out is worth scrutinizing against your own data governance rules.

Best For

Notta suits teams that regularly work across language barriers, and it has grown into a more complete tool than it was a year ago. International organizations, translation-heavy workflows, and globally distributed teams get the most out of the broad transcription coverage, and the mobile and desktop apps make it a solid fit for journalists, researchers, and anyone capturing in-person conversations. The expanded integrations and ask-anything chat also make it more viable as a day-to-day knowledge tool than the “summaries only” reputation suggests. It remains a weak fit for anyone who needs offline capability, on-device privacy, or who balks at paying extra for the real-time translation that drew them to the product in the first place.

How Notta Compares to Hedy

Notta’s language breadth is real, and its 2026 additions close some gaps: there is now a native Mac and Windows desktop app, bot-free local capture, and an ask-anything AI chat over transcripts, so the old “cloud bot with post-meeting summaries only” picture is out of date. Credit where it is due.

The durable difference is where the intelligence runs. Hedy does its transcription, summarization, and real-time coaching entirely on-device; Notta’s desktop app captures audio locally but still ships it to the cloud for processing, and it remains cloud-dependent end to end. Hedy never puts a bot in your meeting at all. Hedy works fully offline; Notta needs an internet connection for its core functions. And Hedy’s coaching surfaces guidance live, in the moment, rather than after the call.

If your single biggest need is translating across many languages, Notta covers that ground well, though you will now pay an add-on fee for the real-time version. For teams who care most about keeping meeting audio off external servers, working offline, and getting help while the conversation is still happening, Hedy is the more complete fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many languages does Notta support? +
Notta markets transcription in 100+ languages and dialects (58 is its core monolingual count). Real-time translation is available across dozens of source and target languages, but it is now a paid add-on rather than part of the base Pro plan.
Is Notta free? +
There is a free plan, but it is restrictive: 120 transcription minutes per month, a hard 3-minute cap on each individual recording, roughly 10 AI summaries per month, and transcript downloads are locked behind a paid plan. The Pro plan runs $13.99/mo billed monthly, or about $8.17/mo ($97.99/yr) billed annually.
Does Notta work with Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet? +
Yes. Notta supports Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. It can join calls with a bot, or you can capture audio bot-free using the Notta Desktop app for Mac and Windows.
Is Notta secure for confidential meetings? +
Notta processes audio in the cloud, so recordings are uploaded to its servers for transcription. It holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2, with encryption in transit and at rest. Note that Notta has been reported to use Japanese-language conversations for AI training, with opt-out gated to Enterprise, so teams with strict confidentiality needs should weigh whether cloud processing fits their data governance.