Microsoft Teams Copilot vs Notta
Both scored against the same 13 criteria, from the same hands-on testing. Here is where each one actually wins.
Last updated August 2026 · 28 tools ranked
Microsoft Teams Copilot rates higher overall, 3.9 out of 5 against Notta's 3.2, across our 13 weighted criteria. Microsoft Teams Copilot leads on data retention & training transparency, real-time / live capability, knowledge connection. Notta still wins on price alone.
Microsoft Teams Copilot
#3 of 28Microsoft's native, agentic meeting AI built into Teams for the Microsoft 365 stack
- Pricing
- No free tier; from $30/user/mo
- Platforms
- Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Notta
#27 of 28AI meeting assistant with multilingual transcription
- Pricing
- Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo
- Platforms
- Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows
All 13 Criteria, Side by Side
| Criterion | Weight | Microsoft Teams Copilot | Notta | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy & Data Security | High | 3 | 3 | Tie |
| Transcription Accuracy | High | 4 | 4 | Tie |
| AI Analysis Quality | High | 4 | 4 | Tie |
| Recording Consent & Compliance | Med | 4 | 3 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Data Retention & Training Transparency | Med | 4 | 2 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Real-Time / Live Capability | Med | 5 | 3 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Recording Method | Med | 4 | 3 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Ease of Use | Med | 5 | 4 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Platform Support | Med | 5 | 4 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Offline Capability | Med | 1 | 1 | Tie |
| Integration Ecosystem | Med | 4 | 4 | Tie |
| Knowledge Connection | Low | 5 | 3 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
| Pricing & Value | Low | 3 | 3 | Tie |
| Overall (weighted) | 3.9 | 3.2 | Microsoft Teams Copilot |
Overall is a weighted average, not a mean: high-weight criteria count triple and low-weight criteria count once. See the formula.
Choose Microsoft Teams Copilot if…
- → Data Retention & Training Transparency matters to you. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 4/5 here against 2/5.
- → Real-Time / Live Capability matters to you. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 5/5 here against 3/5.
- → Knowledge Connection matters to you. Microsoft Teams Copilot scores 5/5 here against 3/5.
A genuinely strong, agentic meeting assistant for Microsoft 365 shops, but it is cloud-only, locked to Teams meetings, and the real meeting AI sits behind a $30/user add-on.
Choose Notta if…
Notta does not lead on any individual criterion in this pairing. It can still be the right call if you are already committed to its ecosystem, but on the merits the other tool is ahead across the board.
A capable multilingual cloud transcriber that has grown its platform and integration story, but real-time translation now costs extra and everything still runs in the cloud.
Microsoft Teams Copilot at a glance
Strengths
- +Native to Teams, no external bot joins the meeting
- +Strong agentic features via the Facilitator agent: live AI notes, agenda tracking, and auto task sync to Planner
- +Deepest integration with Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Word, Planner, SharePoint, grounded in Microsoft Graph)
- +Enterprise-grade compliance: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA with BAA, and no foundation-model training on your data
Limitations
- −Cloud-only with no offline mode
- −Works only inside Microsoft Teams meetings, not a cross-platform or in-person recorder
- −The full meeting Copilot requires the $30/user/month M365 Copilot add-on; real meeting AI is effectively not free
- −Limited native reach into non-Microsoft CRMs and task tools
Notta at a glance
Strengths
- +Broad language coverage (100+ for transcription)
- +Native iOS, Android, and now Mac/Windows desktop apps
- +Bot-free local capture via Notta Desktop
- +Expanded integration set (Salesforce, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, more)
Limitations
- −Cloud processing only
- −Real-time translation is now a paid add-on, not bundled
- −Restrictive free tier (3-minute cap per recording)
- −Reports of auto-renewal charges after cancellation attempts