Fathom vs Notta

Both scored against the same 13 criteria, from the same hands-on testing. Here is where each one actually wins.

Last updated August 2026 · 28 tools ranked

Fathom rates higher overall, 3.9 out of 5 against Notta's 3.2, across our 13 weighted criteria. Fathom leads on data retention & training transparency, knowledge connection, transcription accuracy. Notta still wins on price alone.

Fathom

#2 of 28

Free AI meeting assistant with instant summaries

3.9
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $16/mo
Platforms
Web, macOS, Windows
Read the full Fathom review →

Notta

#27 of 28

AI meeting assistant with multilingual transcription

3.2
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows
Read the full Notta review →

All 13 Criteria, Side by Side

Criterion Weight Fathom Notta Winner
Privacy & Data Security High 3 3 Tie
Transcription Accuracy High 5 4 Fathom
AI Analysis Quality High 4 4 Tie
Recording Consent & Compliance Med 4 3 Fathom
Data Retention & Training Transparency Med 4 2 Fathom
Real-Time / Live Capability Med 3 3 Tie
Recording Method Med 4 3 Fathom
Ease of Use Med 5 4 Fathom
Platform Support Med 4 4 Tie
Offline Capability Med 1 1 Tie
Integration Ecosystem Med 5 4 Fathom
Knowledge Connection Low 5 3 Fathom
Pricing & Value Low 4 3 Fathom
Overall (weighted) 3.9 3.2 Fathom

Overall is a weighted average, not a mean: high-weight criteria count triple and low-weight criteria count once. See the formula.

Choose Fathom if…

  • Data Retention & Training Transparency matters to you. Fathom scores 4/5 here against 2/5.
  • Knowledge Connection matters to you. Fathom scores 5/5 here against 3/5.

The best free option for individuals who want simple, no-fuss meeting notes, now backed by a transparent paid ladder and a real-time desktop app.

Choose Notta if…

Notta does not lead on any individual criterion in this pairing. It can still be the right call if you are already committed to its ecosystem, but on the merits the other tool is ahead across the board.

A capable multilingual cloud transcriber that has grown its platform and integration story, but real-time translation now costs extra and everything still runs in the cloud.

Fathom at a glance

Strengths

  • +Genuinely generous free tier
  • +Very easy to use
  • +Clean summaries
  • +Bot-free capture and real-time summaries

Limitations

  • Cloud processing required
  • Advanced summaries capped at 5 calls/month on free plan
  • No mobile app yet (iOS announced, not shipped)
  • No offline mode

Notta at a glance

Strengths

  • +Broad language coverage (100+ for transcription)
  • +Native iOS, Android, and now Mac/Windows desktop apps
  • +Bot-free local capture via Notta Desktop
  • +Expanded integration set (Salesforce, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, more)

Limitations

  • Cloud processing only
  • Real-time translation is now a paid add-on, not bundled
  • Restrictive free tier (3-minute cap per recording)
  • Reports of auto-renewal charges after cancellation attempts

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fathom or Notta better? +
Fathom scores higher overall — 3.9 out of 5 against Notta's 3.2 — on our 13-criteria weighted scoring. That is a 0.7-point gap, so it is a real but not overwhelming difference. Fathom is the better default choice; Notta is the better choice if you specifically need .
How much do Fathom and Notta cost? +
Fathom: Free tier available; paid from $16/mo. Notta: Free tier available; paid from $8.17/mo. On our pricing and value criterion, which weighs cost against what you get for it, Fathom scores 4/5 and Notta scores 3/5.
Which platforms do Fathom and Notta support? +
Fathom runs on Web, macOS, Windows. Notta runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows. They score the same on platform support.
Which is better for privacy, Fathom or Notta? +
On privacy and data security Fathom scores 3/5 and Notta scores 3/5. Two related criteria matter as much: recording consent and compliance (Fathom 4/5, Notta 3/5) and data retention and training transparency (Fathom 4/5, Notta 2/5). Tools that train on customer data by default or record without clear all-party consent score low on those two regardless of their encryption claims.