Fathom vs Grain

Both scored against the same 13 criteria, from the same hands-on testing. Here is where each one actually wins.

Last updated August 2026 · 28 tools ranked

Fathom rates higher overall, 3.9 out of 5 against Grain's 3.5, across our 13 weighted criteria. Fathom leads on transcription accuracy, recording consent & compliance, data retention & training transparency. Grain still wins on price alone.

Fathom

#2 of 28

Free AI meeting assistant with instant summaries

3.9
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $16/mo
Platforms
Web, macOS, Windows
Read the full Fathom review →

Grain

#18 of 28

AI notetaker and revenue intelligence for agents and teams

3.5
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $15/mo
Platforms
Web, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows
Read the full Grain review →

All 13 Criteria, Side by Side

Criterion Weight Fathom Grain Winner
Privacy & Data Security High 3 3 Tie
Transcription Accuracy High 5 4 Fathom
AI Analysis Quality High 4 4 Tie
Recording Consent & Compliance Med 4 3 Fathom
Data Retention & Training Transparency Med 4 3 Fathom
Real-Time / Live Capability Med 3 2 Fathom
Recording Method Med 4 4 Tie
Ease of Use Med 5 4 Fathom
Platform Support Med 4 4 Tie
Offline Capability Med 1 1 Tie
Integration Ecosystem Med 5 5 Tie
Knowledge Connection Low 5 5 Tie
Pricing & Value Low 4 4 Tie
Overall (weighted) 3.9 3.5 Fathom

Overall is a weighted average, not a mean: high-weight criteria count triple and low-weight criteria count once. See the formula.

Choose Fathom if…

  • Transcription Accuracy matters to you. Fathom scores 5/5 here against 4/5.
  • Recording Consent & Compliance matters to you. Fathom scores 4/5 here against 3/5.
  • Data Retention & Training Transparency matters to you. Fathom scores 4/5 here against 3/5.
  • Real-Time / Live Capability matters to you. Fathom scores 3/5 here against 2/5.

The best free option for individuals who want simple, no-fuss meeting notes, now backed by a transparent paid ladder and a real-time desktop app.

Choose Grain if…

Grain does not lead on any individual criterion in this pairing. It can still be the right call if you are already committed to its ecosystem, but on the merits the other tool is ahead across the board.

A capable cloud notetaker that has grown from a clip-sharing tool into a revenue-intelligence platform for sales and customer-facing teams.

Fathom at a glance

Strengths

  • +Genuinely generous free tier
  • +Very easy to use
  • +Clean summaries
  • +Bot-free capture and real-time summaries

Limitations

  • Cloud processing required
  • Advanced summaries capped at 5 calls/month on free plan
  • No mobile app yet (iOS announced, not shipped)
  • No offline mode

Grain at a glance

Strengths

  • +Strong video clip creation and highlight sharing
  • +Cross-meeting 'Ask anything' RAG search with citations
  • +Deal intelligence and AI coaching for sales teams
  • +Bot-free Desktop Capture on Mac and Windows

Limitations

  • Cloud-only processing and storage
  • No real-time in-meeting coaching
  • No offline capability
  • Business tier adds up across larger teams

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fathom or Grain better? +
Fathom scores higher overall — 3.9 out of 5 against Grain's 3.5 — on our 13-criteria weighted scoring. That is a 0.4-point gap, so it is a real but not overwhelming difference. Fathom is the better default choice; Grain is the better choice if you specifically need .
How much do Fathom and Grain cost? +
Fathom: Free tier available; paid from $16/mo. Grain: Free tier available; paid from $15/mo. On our pricing and value criterion, which weighs cost against what you get for it, Fathom scores 4/5 and Grain scores 4/5.
Which platforms do Fathom and Grain support? +
Fathom runs on Web, macOS, Windows. Grain runs on Web, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows. They score the same on platform support.
Which is better for privacy, Fathom or Grain? +
On privacy and data security Fathom scores 3/5 and Grain scores 3/5. Two related criteria matter as much: recording consent and compliance (Fathom 4/5, Grain 3/5) and data retention and training transparency (Fathom 4/5, Grain 3/5). Tools that train on customer data by default or record without clear all-party consent score low on those two regardless of their encryption claims.