Fathom vs Fireflies.ai

Both scored against the same 13 criteria, from the same hands-on testing. Here is where each one actually wins.

Last updated August 2026 · 28 tools ranked

Fathom rates higher overall, 3.9 out of 5 against Fireflies.ai's 3.7, across our 13 weighted criteria. Fathom leads on recording consent & compliance, data retention & training transparency, recording method. Fireflies.ai still wins on ai analysis quality, real-time / live capability.

Fathom

#2 of 28

Free AI meeting assistant with instant summaries

3.9
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $16/mo
Platforms
Web, macOS, Windows
Read the full Fathom review →

Fireflies.ai

#7 of 28

AI meeting assistant with CRM integration and conversation intelligence

3.7
Pricing
Free tier available; paid from $10/mo
Platforms
Web, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android
Read the full Fireflies.ai review →

All 13 Criteria, Side by Side

Criterion Weight Fathom Fireflies.ai Winner
Privacy & Data Security High 3 3 Tie
Transcription Accuracy High 5 5 Tie
AI Analysis Quality High 4 5 Fireflies.ai
Recording Consent & Compliance Med 4 2 Fathom
Data Retention & Training Transparency Med 4 3 Fathom
Real-Time / Live Capability Med 3 4 Fireflies.ai
Recording Method Med 4 3 Fathom
Ease of Use Med 5 4 Fathom
Platform Support Med 4 4 Tie
Offline Capability Med 1 1 Tie
Integration Ecosystem Med 5 5 Tie
Knowledge Connection Low 5 5 Tie
Pricing & Value Low 4 4 Tie
Overall (weighted) 3.9 3.7 Fathom

Overall is a weighted average, not a mean: high-weight criteria count triple and low-weight criteria count once. See the formula.

Choose Fathom if…

  • Recording Consent & Compliance matters to you. Fathom scores 4/5 here against 2/5.

The best free option for individuals who want simple, no-fuss meeting notes, now backed by a transparent paid ladder and a real-time desktop app.

Choose Fireflies.ai if…

  • AI Analysis Quality matters to you. Fireflies.ai scores 5/5 here against 4/5.
  • Real-Time / Live Capability matters to you. Fireflies.ai scores 4/5 here against 3/5.

Best for sales teams who need deep CRM integration and conversation analytics, now with real-time meeting features layered on top.

Fathom at a glance

Strengths

  • +Genuinely generous free tier
  • +Very easy to use
  • +Clean summaries
  • +Bot-free capture and real-time summaries

Limitations

  • Cloud processing required
  • Advanced summaries capped at 5 calls/month on free plan
  • No mobile app yet (iOS announced, not shipped)
  • No offline mode

Fireflies.ai at a glance

Strengths

  • +Excellent CRM integrations
  • +Strong conversation analytics
  • +Good search across meetings
  • +Real-time features now built in (live notes, voice-activated web search)

Limitations

  • Cloud-only processing
  • Bot joins calls visibly
  • Advanced AI features metered by a credit system on top of seat pricing
  • Can be expensive at scale

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fathom or Fireflies.ai better? +
Fathom scores higher overall — 3.9 out of 5 against Fireflies.ai's 3.7 — on our 13-criteria weighted scoring. That is a 0.2-point gap, so it is a real but not overwhelming difference. Fathom is the better default choice; Fireflies.ai is the better choice if you specifically need ai analysis quality or real-time / live capability.
How much do Fathom and Fireflies.ai cost? +
Fathom: Free tier available; paid from $16/mo. Fireflies.ai: Free tier available; paid from $10/mo. On our pricing and value criterion, which weighs cost against what you get for it, Fathom scores 4/5 and Fireflies.ai scores 4/5.
Which platforms do Fathom and Fireflies.ai support? +
Fathom runs on Web, macOS, Windows. Fireflies.ai runs on Web, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. They score the same on platform support.
Which is better for privacy, Fathom or Fireflies.ai? +
On privacy and data security Fathom scores 3/5 and Fireflies.ai scores 3/5. Two related criteria matter as much: recording consent and compliance (Fathom 4/5, Fireflies.ai 2/5) and data retention and training transparency (Fathom 4/5, Fireflies.ai 3/5). Tools that train on customer data by default or record without clear all-party consent score low on those two regardless of their encryption claims.